Every learning is becoming. Every action that is aimed at learning but doesn’t lead to becoming… is not learning, it is just a pretense. Treading water. The drift.
But becoming is not easy, and it takes longer than you would expect. OK, longer than I expect. Longer than I have been expecting… 🙁
Why? because some of the learning requires you to be “right there”, ready for that particular learning. You first need to become ready.
Read the rest of the article
Tag Archives: Inauthenticity
Love: are gurus loving? Did the Buddha really smile?
Is what they say about love and high vibration true? Or is love the way it is represented huey?
The following email exchange happened today:
6:09 am:
Paypal: Hello Shortcuts Inc.,
> This email confirms that you have received a donation of$2.00 USD to measure the vibration of X…
10 am:
Hi
I have recently requested a measure of my vibration, just wondering when I will get response?
Regards
12:44 pm
On 12 January 2014 12:44, Sophie wrote:
your vibration is 120… you hold it in the tip of your stomach
Middle Of The Road: Public Inauthenticity or the art of getting off the hook
“The opposite of love is not hate, it’s indifference. The opposite of art is not ugliness, it’s indifference. The opposite of faith is not heresy, it’s indifference. And the opposite of life is not death, it’s indifference.” — Elie Wiesel Nobel Peace Prize laureate
“…to remain silent and indifferent is the greatest sin of all.”
Obviously Elie Wiesel and I think alike, so I don’t remain silent and indifferent, I shout to whoever is willing to listen.
Now, with that said, let me get to the topic I indicate in the title…
I know a guy who has developed getting off the hook to an art form.
Given that I have been practicing finding the funny in everything (it’s fun, you should do it!) I laugh when I think of him, while I cringe.
As I have shared before, the fastest way to raise your vibration, all the way to heaven, is to practice public authenticity.
Vibrational Review: Dr. Bradley Nelson, The Emotion Code, and the Avatar State Audios… what’s the difference?
Revisited: What does the vibration number mean? Why are methodologies that actually help people rate low on the vibrational scale? I’ll compare and review the Dr. Bradley Nelson method, The Emotion Code, and the Avatar State Audios.
I just finished watching a few episodes of the Dr. Bradley Nelson show. Dr. Bradley Nelson is a showman, a great salesperson. I think it’s great: I wish I could be more like him doing the work I do. More people would flock to me.
Now, why is Dr. Bradley Nelson’s vibration as low as 190, occasionally as low as 170? Is he an unhappy person? Is this a case of the shoemaker who doesn’t have shoes?
The answer is no. I see two problems with his methodology that would result in such low vibration.
The problem isn’t as much his well-being, peace of mind, etc. as he isn’t in the business of empowering people. His methodology is to work through practitioners, and this model duplicates the system of the medical establishment, the church, the government.
In his system people are treated for an issue with a method that may work, by a practitioner who was “specially trained” to treat people with that method.
So people need to be sick for those practitioners to exist, which means his system perpetuates disease.
How the Harmonize The Planet audio also zaps your anxiety
Being here and now has been a favorite topic of all the fake gurus.
What is a guru? A guru is a person who can teach. I said teach, I didn’t say TALK!
All the gurus I know are big talkers.
What is the difference between talking and teaching? On one hand, you can see the results of teaching: if the student is able to be what is being taught, in the domain of being, then teaching and learning took place.
Knowing about something is not real knowledge, it is talking. Just like talking about flying isn’t flying, talking about love isn’t love…
What makes someone able to learn being? After all, when you communicate (talk) being, it is taken up by the mind, and the mind isn’t interested in being, isn’t able to create being. Especially the mind isn’t interested in you being in the here and now.
Many teachers and courses try to bridge from the mind to the being… Affirmations, inauthenticity exercises, psychodrama, inventing a possibility, the solutions that don’t work well can fill a library.
Hypnosis, noise-treatment, light, sound, smell… visualization, psycho this and psycho that.
All have the same shortcomings: unless being is distinguished on a level beyond the mind, there is no learning, no alteration will happen in being.
Some teachings have a little piece here and there that are useful, but there is no system that has ever been successful. Not in the past 2,000 years, or maybe 3,500 years.
In the Path To Enlightenment Course I am attempting to teach what has never been taught: the art of being in the moment.
Now, a few words about that: you can’t teach being straight, directly. The only way to teach being is to distinguish all the wrong ways of being… Just like you can throw a dart and be off the bull’s eye, in being you can be off target in a million and one ways, and not hit the target being.
But so far, I have found, 3-4 different ways to be off-target that can be distinguished and taught, and there are a few indicators that you are off that even you can sense, feel, or see. The mind won’t be useful here…
One of the indicators is anxiety. Anxiety is easy to recognize, even though different people feel anxiety at different parts of their body, anxiety is so widespread, so ubiquitous, that I don’t have to spend much time identifying it with you.